Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 05:01

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Field of 16: Will Mexico be dream homecoming for Daniel Suárez? - NASCAR.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
"Brokeback Mountain" broke hearts on the big screen, and it's back to do it again - Salon.com
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why Does Your Brain Go Blank? - Newser
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Phys.org
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
RBC Canadian Open 2025 prize money: Full payout from $9.8 million purse - Yahoo Sports
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Rock Icon, 78, Hauled Off Stage in Jaw-Dropping Concert Farewell - Yahoo
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Microsoft lays off hundreds of WA workers, weeks after companywide cuts - The Seattle Times
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.